{"id":2277,"date":"2019-11-05T13:11:32","date_gmt":"2019-11-05T17:11:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/consistent-life.org\/blog\/?p=2277"},"modified":"2019-11-15T11:25:05","modified_gmt":"2019-11-15T15:25:05","slug":"berlin-wall-fall","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/consistent-life.org\/blog\/index.php\/2019\/11\/05\/berlin-wall-fall\/","title":{"rendered":"East Germany\u2019s Peaceful Revolution: Remembering the Berlin Wall\u2019s Fall"},"content":{"rendered":"

by John Whitehead<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"The Berlin Wall fell 30 years ago this year, on November 9, 1989. This massive barrier that since the 1960s had effectively imprisoned the residents of Communist-ruled East Berlin was also a symbol of the larger Cold War division between Eastern and Western Europe and the Soviet Union and the United States. When Berliners broke down the Wall, this signaled the Cold War\u2019s approaching end. The events that led to the Wall\u2019s collapse and the Cold War\u2019s end show how nonviolence resistance can resolve a conflict seemingly destined to be resolved only through catastrophic violence.<\/p>\n

Cold War Tensions<\/strong><\/h3>\n

To appreciate the full significance of the Wall falling, we must remember how bitter and seemingly entrenched the East-West divide was only a few years earlier. In the early 1980s, the mutual hostility and arms race between the hawkish Reagan administration and a hardline Soviet leadership made nuclear war seem the Cold War\u2019s most likely outcome<\/a>. Taylor Downing relates in his book 1983: Reagan, Andropov, and a World on the Brink <\/em>how precisely six years before the Wall came down, from November 9 to 11, 1983, the world came very close to nuclear holocaust<\/a>.<\/p>\n

During those days, an elaborate NATO military exercise, which included forces in West Germany, rehearsed procedures for launching nuclear weapons. Fearing this rehearsal might be preparations for a genuine attack, the Soviet leadership reacted with alarm and heightened military readiness. The exercise ended without violence breaking out, but some further miscommunication or provocation could easily have led to a very different outcome.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the Wall had served as an oppressive presence in East Germans\u2019 lives for decades. One observer of the country\u2019s affairs, writer Timothy Garton Ash, noted that an East Berlin doctor even wrote a book called The Wall Sickness, <\/em>describing the Wall\u2019s toll on people\u2019s health, including contributing to suicides. The Wall also led to death more directly: more than 100 people were killed<\/a> at the Wall while trying to escape or simply because of accidents.<\/p>\n

The European tensions of the early 1980s began to ease by the decade\u2019s end. Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev established a friendlier relationship with the United States, while introducing greater political freedom, including freedom of expression, in the Soviet Union. Such changes were especially significant for Communist East Germany, which even more than most Eastern bloc states took its cue from the Soviets. In his book Magic Lantern, <\/em>Garton Ash noted that East German youth were taught the slogan \u201cTo learn from the Soviet Union is to learn how to a win,\u201d a phrase that took on a new meaning by the late 1980s.<\/p>\n

Nonviolent Resistance & Crisis in East Germany<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Grassroots political dissent in East Germany changed at this time. For years, activists in the city of Leipzig would meet in St. Nicholas\u2019 Church to pray for peace. In 1988, these services grew to include silent marches through the city to protest restrictions on travel outside the country. Such marches were a radical act of defiance of the authorities. Peter Ackerman and Jack DuVall explain in their history of nonviolent resistance, A Force More Powerful, <\/em>that while Communist regimes would tolerate a certain amount of dissent in private spaces such as churches,<\/p>\n

when dissidents ventured out into city streets and public squares, they met with instant repression. Along with command over the mass media, control over the physical arena was a primary means by which communist rulers made sure that opposition was confined to intellectuals and activists, cut off from the larger public. (p. 429)<\/p>\n

That the Leipzig protesters could publicly demonstrate, even silently, showed how the political situation was changing. By early 1989, they were no longer silent but chanted \u201cWe want out!\u201d Public protest against the regime continued to grow in size and assertiveness.<\/p>\n

The East German regime had originally built the Wall in 1961 to stem the flow of East Berliners into the freer and more prosperous West, a trend that threatened the regime\u2019s legitimacy. A similar crisis had arisen by summer 1989. East Germans began seeking asylum in West German diplomatic missions in East Berlin and elsewhere. In September, neighboring Hungary, an Eastern bloc state where the Communist Party had agreed to end its monopoly on political power, decided to open its border with Austria. East Germans responded by fleeing to Hungary and then the west; perhaps 50,000 had fled by the end of October. Not all wanted to flee, however: in Leipzig, where public protests had now swelled to include thousands, the protesters had changed their chant to \u201cWe are staying.\u201d Reforming East Germany from within was the goal.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Turning Point<\/strong><\/h3>\n

That autumn, the protesters again received significant support from the leader of East Germany\u2019s most significant ally. Gorbachev had already announced a reduction in Soviet military forces in Eastern Europe and allowed Hungary and Poland to reform their political systems significantly without Soviet interference. The likelihood that the East German regime would receive outside support in suppressing dissent dwindled. Gorbachev confirmed this non-interventionist attitude in an early October speech in East Germany, in which he urged reform while also saying that the country\u2019s policy should be made \u201cnot in Moscow but Berlin.\u201d He also privately ordered Soviet troops in East Germany to not get involved in any conflict within the country.<\/p>\n

Conflict between the authorities and protesters grew. Police beat and arrested protesters in Leipzig, East Berlin, and elsewhere during the first week of October. A crucial turning point came when Kurt Masur, the conductor of the Leipzig orchestra, arranged an impromptu discussion involving the city\u2019s Communist Party officials, Masur, another musician, and a clergyman. The private talk was meant to find a way of averting further violence and produced an appeal for nonviolence that was read in St. Nicholas\u2019 Church and over the radio. The authorities opted not to employ riot police or the army, and tens of thousands of protesters marched in Leipzig on October 9.<\/p>\n

Events moved quickly over the following month. The Communist Party leadership went through a shake-up, while protests in Leipzig and East Berlin grew to number hundreds of thousands. The final act, though, was essentially the result of an accident. The regime decided to relax restriction on travel to the west; when an official announced this decision on November 9, however, he garbled it and said incorrectly that East Germans could leave the country through Berlin or any other border crossing, effective immediately. When crowds gathered on the east side of the Berlin Wall, the guards decided on their initiative to let them through. The crowds not only poured into West Berlin but quickly took to standing and dancing on the Wall and eventually knocking it down with hammers.<\/p>\n

These dramatic scenes were followed in the coming years by the Communist Party\u2019s fall, the reunification of East and West Germany into a single country, and the Cold War\u2019s end.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/h3>\n

Looking Back<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Remembered 30 years later, the Berlin Wall\u2019s collapse seems more bittersweet than it did at the time. The 20th<\/sup> century\u2019s Cold War has been succeeded by a new one between the United States and Russia, with the dividing line running through Ukraine rather than Germany. (The fact the line of conflict is now much further east than before should perhaps raise some questions about which side has been more expansionist<\/a> over the past three decades.) Meanwhile, other nonviolent revolutions, such as Egypt\u2019s in 2011, have been less successful than East Germany\u2019s. Nonviolent resistance to oppression doesn\u2019t always have happy results\u2014although its track record is still better than violent resistance<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Even with these qualifications, the events leading to the Wall coming down should be celebrated for what, often contrary to conventional wisdom, they accomplished. The Cold War\u2019s hostility was replaced with eased tensions, the Soviet Union reformed and reduced its influence in Eastern Europe, and nonviolent protest brought down highly repressive regimes such as those in East Germany and other Communist nations. While efforts against war and political repression do not always follow this pattern, we should remember that they sometimes do and take inspiration from that.<\/p>\n

When the Wall fell, some Berliners drew historical connections and lessons about nonviolence prevailing over violence. Garton Ash reported that someone stuck a note to the Wall\u2019s remains reading \u201cStalin is dead, Europe lives.\u201d Another said \u201cYou see, it shows Lenin was wrong . . . Lenin said a revolution could succeed only with violence. But this was a peaceful revolution.\u201d<\/p>\n

=========================================<\/p>\n

For more of our posts on historical nonviolence, see:<\/p>\n

Would Nonviolence Work on the Nazis?<\/a><\/p>\n

A Historical Success Story: Duels<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

For more of John Whitehead’s posts on history, see:<\/p>\n

Rejecting Mass Murder: Looking Back on Hiroshima and Nagasaki<\/a><\/p>\n

Finding Common Ground on and Learning from World War II\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

The Wages of War, Part 1: How Abortion Came to Japan<\/a><\/p>\n

Wages of War, Part 2: How Forced Sterilization Came to Japan<\/a><\/p>\n

Nuclear Disarmament as a Social Justice Issue<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by John Whitehead The Berlin Wall fell 30 years ago this year, on November 9, 1989. This massive barrier that since the 1960s had effectively imprisoned the residents of Communist-ruled East Berlin was also a symbol of the larger Cold War division between Eastern and Western Europe and the Soviet Union and the United States…. <\/p>\n