I remember thinking well into the movie that people were going to come out of it with the same opinion about nuclear weapons they had going into it. Pro-nuclear arguments were there, and they had to be; how else could we understand the historical reality being so well portrayed? Anti-nuclear arguments were there, but not as well developed as they would become. But again, it was portraying what people understood at the time.<\/p>\n Plenty of people could see this movie and remain pro-nuclear with some handwringing. Handwringing over massive violence is common and still allows it to continue<\/a>.<\/p>\n What was missing popped out to my anti-nuclear eye. Most noticeably, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a major part of the plot, but were never portrayed. This movie was from the point of view of the makers of the bomb. They could hear the number of civilians killed and be disturbed, but from their perspective, that\u2019s all. And their perspective is what this film is about.<\/p>\n We also have, as one detail, a fellow about to watch the first test who turned down the darkened glasses to watch it, assuring himself that the windshield of the car he sat in (with an open door) would protect him. This was historically accurate, but the movie left out how much the radiation of that test, and subsequent tests, hurt the observers by causing subsequent diseases. We\u2019ve covered the racism<\/a> of this; see also the list of posts below. But this was from the perspective of the people inventing the bomb, and they didn\u2019t know any better. Audience members that didn\u2019t already know better themselves wouldn\u2019t have been informed by the movie.<\/p>\n I expect the average audience member caught the use of euphemism when Oppenheimer corrected someone from calling it a bomb to calling it a gadget. No commentary needed. But the fact that Oppenheimer named the atomic test \u201cTrinity,\u201d thus conscripting God into supporting his violence, as perpetrators of violence frequently do, could have used some commentary. But there was no comment at the time, and this was a portrayal of people at the time.<\/p>\n As a side note, the people most vulnerable to being killed by radiation are unborn children. It was when Juli Loesch, now Julianne Wiley, was explaining this to an audience that a woman asked her: if radiation killing children bothered her, what about the abortion curette? That set Juli on the path to founding Prolifers for Survival. PS\u2019s final meeting was the founding meeting of the Seamless Garment Network, now renamed the Consistent Life Network. But again, the knowledge of what radiation does to children wasn\u2019t covered by the movie, since it covered a time period when such things had not yet been figured out or were being steadfastly ignored.<\/p>\n In any event, my view of its pro- and anti-nuclear balance may be off because I\u2019m so used to stronger anti-nuclear information that I don\u2019t know what information hits people who aren\u2019t so familiar with it. As a major example, one of the sub-plots was about the mathematical calculations that showed that just maybe the one test would ignite the atmosphere and therefore destroy the whole world. They decided that the mathematical probability was \u201cnear zero\u201d and so went ahead with the test. A military general reacted the way most of us would react \u2013 what do you mean, \u201cnear\u201d zero? How about zero? The thing is, I knew decades ago that this had happened. To me, it went along with how insane the whole process was. Someone who didn\u2019t know about it may have it hit them much more strongly.<\/p>\n And then there was the final line of the movie. That line was about as anti-nuclear as the confines of one sentence could be, backed up by what had gone before.<\/p>\n I recommend adults and mature teenagers make a point of seeing this movie (it’s R-rated for good reason and not suitable for children). It\u2019s part of the literature of the reality of nuclear weapons; it\u2019s confined to one aspect, but then, most movies are. We all need to understand the reality rather than the normal Hollywood-style glorification of violence.<\/p>\n ========================================<\/p>\n We have quite a few posts on nuclear weapons; see that section under the list of all our posts<\/a>. For more of our posts on nuclear testing and production, see:<\/em><\/p>\n Unholy Trinity: The Terrible Consequences of the First Nuclear Test<\/a><\/p>\n Fallout at Home Base: Nuclear Testing within the United States<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cThe Affairs of a Handful of Natives\u201d: Nuclear Testing and Racism<\/a><\/p>\n Lethal from the Start: Uranium Mining\u2019s Danger to the Most Vulnerable<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n We also have several movie reviews listed in the list of all our posts<\/a>. For some with similar themes, see:<\/em><\/p>\n The Darkest Hour<\/em>: \u201cGlorifying\u201d War?<\/a><\/p>\n Justice Littered with Injustice: Viewing\u00a0Just Mercy<\/em>\u00a0in a Charged Moment<\/a><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/consistent-life.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/672-Oppenheimer.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/consistent-life.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/1-blog-baby-nuke.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n